facetious 发表于 2025-3-23 09:48:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8610/860955/860955_11.png

鸟笼 发表于 2025-3-23 15:24:57

Nicolas Rescher the multiple variabilities present in these artistic elements on street scenes (such as partial occlusions or their reduced size) make this object detection problem challenging. Our experimental results using different datasets endorse the effectiveness of this proposal.

Intractable 发表于 2025-3-23 19:49:15

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8610/860955/860955_13.png

结果 发表于 2025-3-23 23:00:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8610/860955/860955_14.png

COWER 发表于 2025-3-24 04:56:10

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8610/860955/860955_15.png

craven 发表于 2025-3-24 10:17:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8610/860955/860955_16.png

包裹 发表于 2025-3-24 12:42:37

mal, being comparatively the best that can bemanaged under the circumstances. ..That reason itself enables usto come to terms with this state of affairs, urging us to accept thebest we can do as good enough. .. .Satisfying Reason. is anexplanation of the presuppositions and methods of rational enquiry, anorig978-94-010-4216-1978-94-011-0483-8

etiquette 发表于 2025-3-24 16:40:01

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8610/860955/860955_18.png

藐视 发表于 2025-3-24 22:45:15

The Contrast Between Causal (Explanatory) and Experiential (Normative) Understanding and Its Ramifibout us we correspondingly have at our disposal two very different modes of understanding, based on two very different cognitive perspectives — the explanatorily causal and the affectively experiential.

下级 发表于 2025-3-25 00:46:15

Book 1995. And that is just how rationality works: itwants to leave no loose ends to understanding, seeking to enable us tounderstand things through to the bitter end. .In the twelve chapters that make up.Satisfying Reason., Rescherdevelops and defends the following perspective:..That rationality is a cardin
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Satisfying Reason; Studies in the Theor Nicolas Rescher Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.