GENUS
发表于 2025-3-25 07:20:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8609/860866/860866_21.png
Pepsin
发表于 2025-3-25 07:59:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8609/860866/860866_22.png
跳动
发表于 2025-3-25 14:41:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8609/860866/860866_23.png
Sigmoidoscopy
发表于 2025-3-25 19:14:34
,Saramago’s Dogs: For an Inclusive Humanism,n his writings: dogs appear in many of his novels, and in some of them, they ascend to the rank of central characters. If the dogs always play a positive role, their presence is however charged with symbolism, and their philosophical and artistic functions need to be unpacked. This chapter presents
模范
发表于 2025-3-25 21:14:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8609/860866/860866_25.png
dialect
发表于 2025-3-26 01:16:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8609/860866/860866_26.png
要素
发表于 2025-3-26 06:44:27
Book 2018side. This volume aims at filling this gap by providing a diverse range of philosophical perspectives and expositions on Saramago’s work. The chapters explore some possible issues arising from his works: from his use of Plato’s allegory of the cave to his re-readings of Biblical stories; from his cr
atopic
发表于 2025-3-26 10:12:08
Introduction: Proteus the Philosopher, or Reading Saramago as a Lover of Wisdom,the “essayistic temptation” of his novels: this “temptation” dissolves the divisions and separations between literary genres and transforms the novel into a “literary space,” which, as such, admits everything into his realm: essay, science, historiography, poetry—and also philosophy.
chapel
发表于 2025-3-26 15:22:38
,Some Remarks on a Phenomenological Interpretation of Saramago’s ,y and the relationship between reality and the virtuality of experience. In ., Saramago somehow reverses Plato’s original myth, develops some of its implicit strands and creates a new model for collective imagination.
固定某物
发表于 2025-3-26 17:19:36
,A Contemporary ,: Saramago’s Re-telling of the “Sacrifice of Isaac”, Biblical passage. I maintain that Saramago intends to tell the story of the “Sacrifice of Isaac” from the perspective neither of the perpetrators (God and Abraham) nor of the victim (Isaac)—rather from the perspective of humanity.