Transfusion 发表于 2025-3-23 12:37:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_11.png胰脏 发表于 2025-3-23 17:29:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_12.pngGraves’-disease 发表于 2025-3-23 21:35:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_13.png盲信者 发表于 2025-3-23 23:52:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_14.png我要沮丧 发表于 2025-3-24 04:26:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_15.pngperpetual 发表于 2025-3-24 10:07:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_16.png原谅 发表于 2025-3-24 13:58:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_17.pngBRAND 发表于 2025-3-24 18:13:16
Ming-Yang Kao,Andrzej Lingas,Anna Östlinion of cathedrals”. They are constructivist and practical metaphors that can be considered emblematic of the post-positivist conception of law. As such, they challenge the nuclear thesis of legal positivism: the value-free neutrality of law. This thesis implies that the legal domain is institutional最初 发表于 2025-3-24 21:55:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8604/860346/860346_19.png无思维能力 发表于 2025-3-25 03:01:37
Vesa Halava,Mika Hirvensalo,Ronald de Wolfomy for Raz and Hart is realisable in relative terms, as they would accept that law’s ultimate determination depends on social facts; moreover, they argued for no sharp . between law and morality. This scenario renders the law’s autonomy claim superfluous. Conversely, Kelsen articulated a cogent arg