微尘 发表于 2025-3-28 15:21:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8326/832579/832579_41.png食品室 发表于 2025-3-28 20:05:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8326/832579/832579_42.pngHyperalgesia 发表于 2025-3-29 01:13:48
Raimund Weilandile these theories do not necessarily mean that an absolute sovereign will be harsh and oppressive, they imply that sovereign power can only ever be subjected to a system of self-regulation. This feature of absolute government is very apparent in Bodin’s and Hobbes’ insistence that legal regulationsBROW 发表于 2025-3-29 04:52:15
Raimund Weiland significance of ‘the many’ have had a chequered career. Aristotle used the term ‘democracy’ to refer to a form of government that is necessarily unjust because it involves the exercise of political power by ordinary members of the population in their own, exclusive interests. Both he and Plato asso过份好问 发表于 2025-3-29 07:26:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8326/832579/832579_45.pngengagement 发表于 2025-3-29 12:32:05
Raimund Weilandn related to the need for coercive regulatory agencies to repress behaviour that threatens the stability of society and jeopardises beneficial human interaction. Secondly, order has been treated in more positive terms, and has been identified with establishing a basis from which human beings can reaPresbycusis 发表于 2025-3-29 15:40:01
Raimund Weiland played an important role in a range of theories that have implications for the regulation of political authority. In order to understand the regulatory role of an appeal to ‘nature’, it is necessary to distinguish theories that rely on the idea of ‘natural law’ or ‘the law(s) of nature’ from those加入 发表于 2025-3-29 21:39:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8326/832579/832579_48.png