巨头
发表于 2025-3-27 00:21:55
Ryle on Perception,of the ideas and reasonings it contains. A notable source of its vitality is the resolution with which he avoids the ordinary devices of scholarly exposition. Other philosophers are seldom mentioned by name and even less often quoted. The positions criticised are not precisely and historically ident
你不公正
发表于 2025-3-27 03:17:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8324/832390/832390_32.png
abstemious
发表于 2025-3-27 05:45:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8324/832390/832390_33.png
阻止
发表于 2025-3-27 10:33:55
Categories,t the case that category-propositions (namely, assertions that terms belong to certain categories or types) are always philosopher’s propositions, but, I believe, the converse is also true. So we are in the dark about the nature of philosophical problems and methods if we are in the dark about types
pantomime
发表于 2025-3-27 17:15:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8324/832390/832390_35.png
思考才皱眉
发表于 2025-3-27 21:15:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8324/832390/832390_36.png
惊呼
发表于 2025-3-28 01:17:35
Words and Sentences,particular topic —namely, that of the relations, or some of them, between the notions of ., and .. On this topic, on which Ryle has written more than once,. he seems to me, though battling on the side of the angels, to have gone wrong in some respects; and I believe he has gone wrong through seeking
GROG
发表于 2025-3-28 05:04:58
Ryle in Relation to Modern Science,ch more as simply part of nature, rather than as set over nature. Even statistically there has been a great change in emphasis. Thirty years ago it seemed quite likely that the origin of the solar system was due to a highly improbable celestial accident and that it was not unreasonable to suppose th
竞选运动
发表于 2025-3-28 08:34:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8324/832390/832390_39.png
FIS
发表于 2025-3-28 10:37:47
In Defence of Platonic Division,s of the ., and . In his . paper of 1939 (reprinted in R. E. Allen’s . .), and again in the chapter on Dialectic in ., Professor Ryle has made scathing remarks about this “method,” and has drawn a sharp contrast between it and genuine dialectic or philosophy: the construction of Linnaeus-type genus-