Halfhearted 发表于 2025-3-23 11:29:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831982/831982_11.pngprosthesis 发表于 2025-3-23 14:34:37
Heta Aalirsuch, die Theorielücke etwas zu verkleinern und Befragtenverhalten allgemein und speziell im RRT-Modus theoretisch zu erklären und dadurch zu empirisch testbaren Hypothesen zu gelangen. Hierzu werden in Unterkapitel 3.1 zunächst die theoretischen Fragen konkretisiert, der größere Theorierahmen abge梯田 发表于 2025-3-23 20:49:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831982/831982_13.png设想 发表于 2025-3-24 00:15:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831982/831982_14.png散步 发表于 2025-3-24 05:20:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831982/831982_15.pngcultivated 发表于 2025-3-24 09:09:11
From Family to Politics: Queen Apollonis as Agent of Dynastic/Political Loyalty,n diplomacy, and how political loyalty to the kings was ultimately loyalty to a dynasty. In this sense, bonds of loyalty favored by Apollonis were at the same time dynastic and political, and her actions must be understood as political.先驱 发表于 2025-3-24 12:53:10
,The Tragic Queen: Dynastic Loyalty and the ‘Queenships’ of Mary Queen of Scots,on of the English crown, as Elizabeth I, the last of the Tudors, did not marry and bear heirs, making the Catholic Mary Elizabeth’s closest dynastic heir. Beem argues that Mary’s marriage choices and flight to England in 1568 were motivated primarily by her quest to realize her English inheritance.breadth 发表于 2025-3-24 16:08:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831982/831982_18.pngMuffle 发表于 2025-3-24 22:00:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831982/831982_19.png能够支付 发表于 2025-3-25 01:32:26
,French Historians’ Loyalty and Disloyalty to French Monarchy Between 1815 and 1848,ting about past royals the historians took a stand on the nature and role of the contemporary reigning monarchy, the July Monarchy. Neutrality was not an option and all historians had to choose their sides. They were thus both constructing and writing history.