不易燃 发表于 2025-3-28 15:48:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831950/831950_41.png整体 发表于 2025-3-28 20:59:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831950/831950_42.pngAxon895 发表于 2025-3-29 00:27:32
Stephan Sonnenburg0; and the greater part of these are devoted to the philosophy of nature as a whole. On chemistry as a special domain of physical nature no more than perhaps five treatises are to be found. Academic concern with Hegel’s philosophy of nature has not been less insignificant. In the years from 1945 to六边形 发表于 2025-3-29 06:21:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831950/831950_44.png桉树 发表于 2025-3-29 07:18:45
f nature (for reasons which I am going to state) but with Hegel and the organic view of nature, which is something entirely different. The main reason I prefer not to dwell primarily on Hegel’s own philosophy of nature, including his own views of organic nature, is that it makes specific claims, manintimate 发表于 2025-3-29 12:31:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831950/831950_46.png枫树 发表于 2025-3-29 16:14:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8320/831950/831950_47.png