dilute
发表于 2025-3-25 05:20:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8303/830226/830226_21.png
fodlder
发表于 2025-3-25 10:25:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8303/830226/830226_22.png
高原
发表于 2025-3-25 14:52:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8303/830226/830226_23.png
不感兴趣
发表于 2025-3-25 19:53:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8303/830226/830226_24.png
NUL
发表于 2025-3-25 20:12:40
Now What? Richard J. Bernstein and Philosophy after Rortythat he has joined the ranks of other philosoph- ical iconoclasts who left behind a good deal of insecurity concerning the susceptibilities of Western philosophy to attacks upon its most basic presuppositions.
DOSE
发表于 2025-3-26 00:15:24
Ideals after the “Pragmatic Turn”s of the past century, specifically, those post-”linguistic turn” philosophers of roughly the past half century or so. By Bernstein’s reckoning, this shift in orien- tation is nothing short of a philosophical “sea change.”
Substance
发表于 2025-3-26 07:01:47
Pragmatism’s Constructive Project that were broached quite early in Putnam’s career, as if his careful studies of the classical pragmatists had provided a context in which insights he had half-formulated could be more fully developed. Bernstein’s chapter helps us to recognize this continuity.
overbearing
发表于 2025-3-26 11:50:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8303/830226/830226_28.png
Confess
发表于 2025-3-26 14:40:30
Prelude to a Critical Conversation with Fellow Pragmatistsrs to this symposium for engaging with my work. I am also grateful that several of the contributors explore some of my other writings on pragmatic themes. The essays in . are like a series of snapshots or stills taken from over 50 years of dynamic engagement. I begin my responses with three general
印第安人
发表于 2025-3-26 19:26:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8303/830226/830226_30.png