PARA 发表于 2025-3-27 00:32:22
1566-7650 ng a specifically rhetorical approach to argumentation.Demon.This book contains 20 essays tracing the work of David Zarefsky, a leading North American scholar of argumentation from a rhetorical perspective. The essays cohere around 4 general themes: objectives for studying argumentation rhetorically说不出 发表于 2025-3-27 01:08:18
1566-7650 itics and governance. All these topics are addressed in this book..Each of the conceptual essays includes brief application to specific cases, and five extended case studies are also presented in this volume. T978-3-319-37938-8978-3-319-05485-8Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907平息 发表于 2025-3-27 06:04:56
Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentationshed in the journal ., 22 (2008), 317–330, published by Springer. It is based on a presentation for a conference on strategic maneuvering in specific fields and contexts, held at the University of Amsterdam in the fall of 2007.allergen 发表于 2025-3-27 11:31:59
Book 2014terns and schemes of argumentation in public reasoning, and the influence of debate on politics and governance. All these topics are addressed in this book..Each of the conceptual essays includes brief application to specific cases, and five extended case studies are also presented in this volume. T机构 发表于 2025-3-27 16:41:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8301/830049/830049_35.pngSaline 发表于 2025-3-27 19:02:36
David Zarefskyr, die versuchen mit schlanken und wertschöpfenden Prozessen entsprechende Erfolge zu erzielen. Prozess-Management ist ein zentraler Bestandteil eines integrierten Konzeptes für das Geschäftsprozess- und Workflow-Management. Es dient dem Abgleich mit der Unternehmensstrategie, der organisatorischen小平面 发表于 2025-3-27 23:46:43
978-3-319-37938-8Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014独裁政府 发表于 2025-3-28 02:45:40
Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation978-3-319-05485-8Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907mighty 发表于 2025-3-28 08:47:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/84/8301/830049/830049_39.png知识分子 发表于 2025-3-28 12:07:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05485-8Advanced Debate; Advocacy and Judgment in Public Argument; Argument analysis and criticism; Argument as