情节剧
发表于 2025-3-25 05:07:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829966/829966_21.png
屈尊
发表于 2025-3-25 08:01:43
The Western Front in 1918,ly, without acknowledging the outstanding performance of the BEF, still under the command of Sir Douglas Haig? Lloyd George’s solution is soon evident. First, the Allied reverses suffered during the German offensives beginning on 21 March were primarily Haig’s responsibility. The BEF had been seriou
异端
发表于 2025-3-25 11:51:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829966/829966_23.png
gorgeous
发表于 2025-3-25 18:16:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829966/829966_24.png
滑稽
发表于 2025-3-25 22:22:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829966/829966_25.png
闲荡
发表于 2025-3-26 01:30:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829966/829966_26.png
投票
发表于 2025-3-26 07:28:59
Book 2005rance and Belgium. Yet as War Minister and Prime Minister Lloyd George presided over the bloody offensives of 1916-17, and had earlier taken a leading role in mobilising industrial resources to provide the weapons which made them possible. Rewriting the First World War examines how Lloyd George addressed this paradox.
Sputum
发表于 2025-3-26 10:14:05
war focused on the generals‘ incompetence, their obsession with the Western Front, and their refusal to consider alternatives to the costly trench warfare in France and Belgium. Yet as War Minister and Prime Minister Lloyd George presided over the bloody offensives of 1916-17, and had earlier taken
痛打
发表于 2025-3-26 13:54:06
Introduction,ritain was right to intervene in support of its Entente partners, but also was the political and military leadership correct to raise a mass army and fight the main German forces on the Western Front and could some other, cheaper way, to defeat the Central Powers have been found?
Paleontology
发表于 2025-3-26 19:29:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829966/829966_30.png