Canvas 发表于 2025-3-28 17:37:05
Dependency Pairs for Rewriting with Built-In Numbers and Semantic Data Structures,isets) and contains built-in numbers, thus extending our previous work presented at CADE 2007 . These rewrite systems, which are based on normalized rewriting on constructor terms, allow the specification of algorithms in a natural and elegant way. Built-in numbers are helpful for this since numbneoplasm 发表于 2025-3-28 21:54:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829955/829955_42.png间谍活动 发表于 2025-3-28 23:18:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829955/829955_43.png通情达理 发表于 2025-3-29 03:06:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829955/829955_44.png向外才掩饰 发表于 2025-3-29 09:20:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829955/829955_45.png易受刺激 发表于 2025-3-29 15:22:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8300/829955/829955_46.png从属 发表于 2025-3-29 17:52:17
Arctic Termination ...Below Zero,natural numbers extended with -∞,with the operations ”max” and ”plus”. This extends the matrix method for term rewriting and the arctic matrix method for string rewriting. In combination with the Dependency Pairs transformation, this allows for some conceptually simple termination proofs in cases whPHONE 发表于 2025-3-29 23:34:04
Logics and Automata for Totally Ordered Trees,archical and a sequential structure; one example for such data are natural language sentences, where a sequential structure is given by word order, and a hierarchical structure is given by grammatical relations between words. In this paper, we study monadic second-order logic (MSO) for .. We show thgenesis 发表于 2025-3-30 00:15:24
Diagram Rewriting for Orthogonal Matrices: A Study of Critical Peaks,s structure was introduced by the first author. One of the rules is similar to Yang-Baxter equation. It involves a map . : ]0, .[. →]0, .[...In order to obtain the algebraic properties of ., we study the confluence of critical peaks (or critical pairs) for our rewrite system. For that purpose, we inatrophy 发表于 2025-3-30 05:21:54
Nominal Unification from a Higher-Order Perspective,c, bound variables are treated as atoms, and only free variables are proper unknowns in nominal unification. This allows “variable capture”, breaking a fundamental principle of lambda-calculus. Despite this difference, nominal unification can be seen from a higher-order perspective. From this view,