Adrenaline
发表于 2025-3-23 11:21:02
The Languages of Nationalismch language are we speaking of? The .? The ‘national’ language? The militant language of nationalists? The messianic language of the national Promised Land? The dialect destined to become a national language? The particular lexicon of the intellectual, military or religious elite aspir-ing to national power?
Pander
发表于 2025-3-23 15:03:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829832/829832_12.png
Incorruptible
发表于 2025-3-23 19:42:01
Introductionethnic conflicts.. This quantitative approach to nationalism is certainly not the most interesting one—still less as it suggests that nationalism is inherently violent—but it reconfirms in its own way that nationalism is certainly the most potent force in the world today, and has been so for almost two hundred years.
吼叫
发表于 2025-3-23 22:34:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829832/829832_14.png
信条
发表于 2025-3-24 05:27:11
Conclusione multiplication of nation-states all over the world. At the be-ginning of the nineteenth century there were about ten states—most of them European—in the world; today there are nearly two hundred. Such an increase testifies to the strength of the principle of self-determination, which proclaims the right of peoples to decide their own future.
Wernickes-area
发表于 2025-3-24 08:34:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829832/829832_16.png
说不出
发表于 2025-3-24 12:20:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829832/829832_17.png
湿润
发表于 2025-3-24 17:10:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829832/829832_18.png
encyclopedia
发表于 2025-3-24 21:31:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829832/829832_19.png
流逝
发表于 2025-3-25 00:58:20
Nationalism and Multiculturalismotions—and setting aside those of their possible meanings which would make that analysis fruitless or impracticable from the outset. Thus, in the discussion that follows, the word ‘multiculturalism’ will refer exclusively, not to .—which is characteristic of most contemporary liberal democracies—but