HERTZ
发表于 2025-3-25 05:26:54
War, Self-Defense, and Defense of Others,Robert Holmes was one of my teachers, and I have long admired him for both his philosophical and his human excellences. I am thus delighted to contribute to a symposium that quite properly places his recent book at the center of attention for a discussion of the moral issues of war and peace.
Stress
发表于 2025-3-25 08:01:06
Why have Criminal Law at All?, a particular individual, the possibility that they might be inflicted may be sufficient to generate enough fear in that individual to cause him to refrain from acting in ways he otherwise would have found desirable—a coercive curtailment of his liberty.
committed
发表于 2025-3-25 12:23:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829265/829265_23.png
floodgate
发表于 2025-3-25 16:07:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829265/829265_24.png
道学气
发表于 2025-3-25 20:14:19
The Will to Deviance,inary science, Melville finally lights on the concept of “natural depravity “—a concept that transcends our ordinary secular consciousness of ordinary badness and engages a perspective (one of extraordinary evil, seductive sin, and self-chosen loathsomeness) that seems mythic and theological.
pus840
发表于 2025-3-26 02:35:22
0921-8599 ow begins to developsome doubts about the version of the retributive theory with which hisname has long been associated. .978-90-481-4170-8978-94-015-7922-3Series ISSN 0921-8599 Series E-ISSN 2542-8349
使更活跃
发表于 2025-3-26 05:09:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829265/829265_27.png
Budget
发表于 2025-3-26 10:07:44
Why have Criminal Law at All?,gmatize and humiliate those persons, and typically cause those persons great personal unhappiness. Even when punishments are not actually inflicted on a particular individual, the possibility that they might be inflicted may be sufficient to generate enough fear in that individual to cause him to re
Systemic
发表于 2025-3-26 14:43:32
Retributivism, Moral Education, and the Liberal State,e theorists claim that punishment makes sure that wrongdoers suffer in proportion to their moral iniquity and thereby give up any unfair advantage over others their wrongdoing may have won them.1 Moral education theorists—who seem to be dominating philosophical discussion these days—maintain that pu
Hectic
发表于 2025-3-26 19:38:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8293/829265/829265_30.png