四目在模仿 发表于 2025-3-25 06:39:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829166/829166_21.png丰富 发表于 2025-3-25 08:35:14
2524-4248 come up with a scientific explanation of the origin of laws. .Wrestling with these intriguing problems, the papers in this volume broaden both our understanding of the natural order and our desiderata of scient978-3-030-96777-2978-3-030-96775-8Series ISSN 2524-4248 Series E-ISSN 2524-4256Obliterate 发表于 2025-3-25 12:54:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829166/829166_23.png群岛 发表于 2025-3-25 18:52:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96775-8Determinism and causation; Empiricism; Humean supervenience; gauge symmetries; kinematics and dynamics; Lamorphous 发表于 2025-3-25 23:34:44
978-3-030-96777-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerlxanthelasma 发表于 2025-3-26 03:08:01
Rethinking the Concept of Law of Nature978-3-030-96775-8Series ISSN 2524-4248 Series E-ISSN 2524-4256伙伴 发表于 2025-3-26 05:05:46
Ratbag Idealism,A discussion of the sense in which reality is mind-dependent for Kant and for David Lewis. Plus a lot about space-aliens (and a bit about pimple-worms).arbovirus 发表于 2025-3-26 09:23:25
Yemima Ben-MenahemUniquely focusses on critique of the traditional concept of law of nature.The case studies in the volume come from cutting edge scientific theories.Develops a number of new concepts of natural order scrucial 发表于 2025-3-26 14:21:24
Governing Without a Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism About Laws of Nature,eans, who think that laws . it. The metaphysics can place demands on the proper formulations of physical theories. It is sometimes assumed that the governing view requires a fundamental/intrinsic direction of time: to govern, laws must be ., producing later states of the world from earlier ones, inREIGN 发表于 2025-3-26 18:35:52
How to Make the World Safe for Autonomy; or, How to Fodor-Kitcher an Albert-Loewer,equent claims by non-reductive physicalists (such as Fodor and Kitcher) that the special sciences are autonomous. This paper argues that if the main ideas behind the Albert/Loewer picture are correct, then this picture can be tweaked to underwrite rather than to undercut the autonomy of the special