讽刺文章
发表于 2025-3-21 18:29:01
书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0829146<br><br> <br><br>
Tinea-Capitis
发表于 2025-3-21 20:16:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829146/829146_2.png
beta-carotene
发表于 2025-3-22 01:25:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829146/829146_3.png
Spinal-Fusion
发表于 2025-3-22 05:40:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829146/829146_4.png
淘气
发表于 2025-3-22 11:49:28
978-3-031-64231-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
kidney
发表于 2025-3-22 15:11:07
Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy978-3-031-64229-6Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942
创作
发表于 2025-3-22 20:25:09
Worlds, Algorithms, and Niches: The Feedback-Loop Idea in Kuhn’s Philosophyes, therefore allowing us to read them as constituting a virtuous epistemic cycle. Finally, we will apply our unified interpretation of the three theses to scientific practice to sketch a novel neo-Kuhnian picture of theory choice.
adhesive
发表于 2025-3-22 22:53:29
Kuhn’s ‘Does Knowledge “Grow”?’: Second Thoughts on the Nature of Epistemic Progressective. Ludwig Wittgenstein’s and John L. Austin’s writings inspired in him a new account of the grounds for knowledge-claims, as opposed to those for belief-claims. In that lecture, Kuhn related this new account to his explanation of scientific change and drew some conclusions on the question concerning the ‘growth’ of knowledge.
预防注射
发表于 2025-3-23 04:37:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8292/829146/829146_9.png
tattle
发表于 2025-3-23 08:23:05
Book 2024tions. is regarded as one of the most influential works in the philosophy of science. This book not only revisits his legacy in the history and philosophy of science but also explores and reflects on the prospect of the Kuhnian philosophy. Moreover, it includes the edited text of Kuhn’s ‘Does Knowle