补给线 发表于 2025-3-21 20:01:07

书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0829005<br><br>        <br><br>

Myofibrils 发表于 2025-3-21 20:36:19

The Real Distinction Between Mind and Body, argument, Descartes concludes that the mind can exist without the body. Many scholars argue that, for him, the mind does not need the brain to exist. If this separatist interpretation is true, then Descartes’s real distinction argument is not consistent with any kind of emergentism requiring a phys

Aprope 发表于 2025-3-22 00:48:10

Challenging the Cartesian Mind Paradigm,his claim conflicts with the separatist interpretation of real distinction argument. Furthermore, Descartes’s view of imagination leads to reconsider whether, for Descartes, the mind depends, in a certain way, on the body.

万花筒 发表于 2025-3-22 07:10:30

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8291/829005/829005_4.png

Eeg332 发表于 2025-3-22 12:08:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8291/829005/829005_5.png

柳树;枯黄 发表于 2025-3-22 15:13:15

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8291/829005/829005_6.png

MOCK 发表于 2025-3-22 18:58:18

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8291/829005/829005_7.png

NAG 发表于 2025-3-22 22:49:33

Introduction, are public and observable, while mental things are private and are only accessible by introspection. Lastly, for Descartes, to think is necessary to be conscious; while human beings are conscious, animals are unconscious, and are only machines.

Infantry 发表于 2025-3-23 02:49:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8291/829005/829005_9.png

Fabric 发表于 2025-3-23 08:38:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8291/829005/829005_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Rethinking Descartes’s Substance Dualism; Lynda Gaudemard Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Descartes Substance Dualism.Descar