暴露他抗议
发表于 2025-3-26 22:24:20
On token physicalism and anomalous monism,ing in that particular mental state is . being in brain (or CNS) state .. There is quite a large philosophical literature dealing with this claim;. I refer to it here as a ‘theory’ in recognition of its research-guiding function in some recent neuroscientific work. For example, in his paper ‘From Ne
灌输
发表于 2025-3-27 05:06:02
On rules and human conduct,ciously’ known or ‘unconsciously’ known) is . entailed by concept-acquisition and concept-use. Having attempted to establish this point, I shall then try to specify some important properties of ‘rules’ as these . enter into domains of human conduct. Some of these properties stand in contrast to thos
初学者
发表于 2025-3-27 07:45:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828991/828991_33.png
thalamus
发表于 2025-3-27 11:31:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828991/828991_34.png
施舍
发表于 2025-3-27 15:02:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828991/828991_35.png
LINE
发表于 2025-3-27 18:34:08
On the dereification of mind,operly conceived) and the study of brains and nervous systems, it is quite obvious that without the necessary physiological equipment to enable us to do what we do (so that the mental vocabulary can apply to us) there would be nothing for the student of mind to study. The main point being advanced h
组装
发表于 2025-3-28 01:48:14
Conclusion,ognition; one which, as Haugeland has put it, takes as its ‘guiding inspiration’ the view that a theory of cognition ‘should have the same basic form as the theories that explain sophisticated computer systems’;. I have also been advancing some methodological and conceptual arguments in support of a
空中
发表于 2025-3-28 05:46:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828991/828991_38.png
翻布寻找
发表于 2025-3-28 07:02:13
Conclusion, sociologically-sensitive alternative to the rule of computationalism in cognitive studies. I am in full agreement with Heil who, in a recent paper on Fodor’s metatheory for cognitive science,. argues as follows:
BALK
发表于 2025-3-28 11:52:55
Introduction, case not only within human psychology, but within theoretical linguistics, philosophy of mind and action, microsociology and anthropology. Indeed, since the celebrated Chomsky-Skinner debate of the late nineteen fifties, one can trace a polarisation among theoreticians in the human sciences, if not a full-blown case of a ‘paradigm-shift’.