Coolidge 发表于 2025-3-21 20:07:59
书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Rethinking Causality, Complexity and Evidence for the Unique Patient读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0828981<br><br> <br><br>inchoate 发表于 2025-3-21 20:31:14
Rani Lill Anjum,Samantha Copeland,Elena RoccaThis book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access.The first book to apply the novel framework of causal dispositionalism to the clinic.A multidisciplinary book dealing withLUCY 发表于 2025-3-22 04:10:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828981/828981_3.png走调 发表于 2025-3-22 04:50:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828981/828981_4.pnginveigh 发表于 2025-3-22 09:55:52
Introduction: Why Is Philosophy Relevant for Clinical Practice?cal perspective and presents a singular overall framework. The second part is written primarily by clinicians who address some implications of the philosophical framework for different aspects of their own practice.密码 发表于 2025-3-22 16:20:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828981/828981_6.pngTortuous 发表于 2025-3-22 19:44:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828981/828981_7.pngalleviate 发表于 2025-3-22 22:24:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8290/828981/828981_8.pngIndelible 发表于 2025-3-23 03:01:33
Above and Beyond Statistical Evidence. Why Stories Matter for Clinical Decisions and Shared Decisioned causal evidence and shows that evidence from population trials is just one piece of the puzzle for understanding causality in the single case. Low further reflects on the importance of moving past the biomedical and the bio-psychosocial models, that fail to honour the stories the patient tells or适宜 发表于 2025-3-23 07:41:01
Causality and Dispositionality in Medical Practicer a new framework for medical practice, one that fully acknowledges patient narratives as evidential and emphasises the importance of understanding rare symptoms and responses as being nonetheless part of a larger pattern of dispositions and manifestations.