使成波状 发表于 2025-3-23 11:35:25
Including Foreigners in National Welfare States: Institutional Venues and Rules of the Game,73 oil shock, when governments sought to curtail migration and became preoccupied with welfare-state spending. Socioeconomic restructuring, stagflation, and unemployment created a context in which it was easy to blame immigrants for economic downturns and social problems.不吉祥的女人 发表于 2025-3-23 14:00:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828895/828895_12.pngdyspareunia 发表于 2025-3-23 21:29:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828895/828895_13.png模仿 发表于 2025-3-24 00:03:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828895/828895_14.png责任 发表于 2025-3-24 02:30:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828895/828895_15.pngindignant 发表于 2025-3-24 08:14:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828895/828895_16.png愚蠢人 发表于 2025-3-24 10:41:47
Including Foreigners in National Welfare States: Institutional Venues and Rules of the Game, been conceived in the age of nation-building, creating solidarity between a body of citizens. Starting in the 1970s, the composition of immigrant communities changed, as family reunification took place. Foreigners’ contributions to the welfare-state no longer outweighed the benefits that they recei四目在模仿 发表于 2025-3-24 15:54:09
Negotiating Welfare Reforms: Actors and Institutions in the Japanese Welfare State,sumption that the welfare state goes through separate phases of expansion and retrenchment. What seems to be happening in Japan is an overall reshuffling of costs and benefits within the welfare state.ticlopidine 发表于 2025-3-24 20:46:12
Political Trust and Support for the Welfare State: Unpacking a Supposed Relationship,des and perceptions, through their way of functioning and by their embodiment of social norms. Institutions affect our perceptions about what exists, what may be achieved, and what is good and just. In relation to the themes of this volume, one could argue that political institutions affect not only天空 发表于 2025-3-25 01:29:48
The Universal Welfare State as a Social Dilemma,social insurance and education, for example—can be privately consumed. This means that A, who owns the good, can exclude B from consuming the good in question. So in order for the welfare state to be understood as a bundle of publicly provided private goods, it would not be a suitable candidate for