Bmd955 发表于 2025-3-25 04:59:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828894/828894_21.png

船员 发表于 2025-3-25 07:42:06

The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Transition of the Welfare States in Central and Eastern Europee too confused to be under control. What is true in one field may cause serious damages in other fields. Old and new dangers are appearing: killing diseases and unknown, fast spreading insects, billionaire brokers manipulating exchange rates, religious terrorism, etc. No one is able to understand an

远地点 发表于 2025-3-25 11:59:02

State and Citizenship in the Age of Globalisationanation of its spread and variations: the factor determining the generosity of social benefits in any given country was proximity to Stockholm. Already Copenhagen and Oslo were departures from the alembicated purity of the Swedish welfare state. By the time one got to London or Bonn and then further

委屈 发表于 2025-3-25 17:16:45

Origins of the 《Social State》 in German Philosophy and 《Staatswissenschaft》onal community of workers is as fundamental to it as are conservative defensive strategies against the social revolution. Standing alongside these sources have been, from the very beginning, deeply-rooted ideas of the 《Caritas》 of “Christian personalism.” These superficially contradictory basic conc

GRATE 发表于 2025-3-25 23:27:57

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828894/828894_25.png

Gleason-score 发表于 2025-3-26 01:02:11

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828894/828894_26.png

水槽 发表于 2025-3-26 04:40:48

The Unpaid Work of Mothers and Housewives in the Different Types of Welfare Statesffer considerably on this point? That is the central issue that will be addressed in this chapter. European data on the distribution of household work between men and women lead to different conclusions (Section II). One observation is that, although increasing numbers of women have jobs outside the

modest 发表于 2025-3-26 10:39:39

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828894/828894_28.png

BILK 发表于 2025-3-26 15:49:28

Does the Welfare State Destroy the Family?d both of them have undergone deep transformations in that recent period of history that we call modernity. For Aristotle (in his theory of friendship and “oikos”) and still for I. Kant (in his“Recht der häuslichen Gesellschaftoikos”) personal and material spheres were still integrated. Starting wit

太空 发表于 2025-3-26 17:37:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828894/828894_30.png
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Restructuring the Welfare State; Theory and Reform of Peter Koslowski,Andreas Føllesdal Conference proceedings 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin