ALIEN 发表于 2025-3-23 11:41:21
Introduction,, or Whig. The attitude that the writer takes to the political issues of the war and to any later events in English history that he has opportunity to notice is generally sufficient to indicate which of these labels should be applied to his history, but occasionally it is also useful to refer to wha镇痛剂 发表于 2025-3-23 15:53:43
Royalist and Parliamentarian Historians before the Restoration, from the following, but a few general observations about these genres may be included to serve as an introduction and to fill the gaps. Autobiographical patches often appear in the histories, but no full length autobiographies or memoirs dealing sufficiently with the war to be considered as histori冥界三河 发表于 2025-3-23 19:47:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828833/828833_13.png吸引力 发表于 2025-3-24 02:13:19
Rushworth and Nalson,oblems about the publication and content of the . have to be examined, the following outline may be given. The First Part, without volume number or part number, appeared under the date 1659. Volumes two and three (1680) constituted “The Second Part,” volumes four and five (1692) constituted “The Thi大吃大喝 发表于 2025-3-24 04:51:33
Whitelocke,e years as to their accuracy. James Wellwood, writing a little more than a generation after Whitelocke’s death, declared that the .” . It will be noticed that this assertion contains a limitation: an area is indicated in which he cannot be so fully depended upon as elsewhere. The editors of the ., w朝圣者 发表于 2025-3-24 09:48:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828833/828833_16.pngBrocas-Area 发表于 2025-3-24 11:35:13
Parliamentarian and Whig Historians from the Restoration to 1702,od from the Restoration to 1702 through the fierceness of their advocacy of the Parliamentarian cause or, more particularly, of the republicanism to which their Parliamentarianism led them. We have seen that in the same period Rushworth expresses his Parliamentarian views only weakly, Whitelocke isMAIM 发表于 2025-3-24 18:00:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8289/828833/828833_18.pngALT 发表于 2025-3-24 21:33:37
Book 1974 England up to 1702, the year of the publication of the first volume of Clarendon‘s History of the Rebellion. By the terms of this definition, Clarendon is himself, of course, one of the historians studied. Clarendon‘s History is so formidable an achievement that all historians writing about the warcanvass 发表于 2025-3-25 02:51:21
Royce MacGillivrays zu leugnen, hieße die Natur und sich selbst verneinen. Es mag uns heute deshalb schon fremd und sonderbar anmuten wenn man lange geglaubt hat, auf dem gegenteiligen Standpunkte verharren zu müssen, indem man dem Menschen eine Sonderstellung bestimmter Urt zuwies, wenn man ihn nicht ganz auberhalb