抵消
发表于 2025-3-27 00:01:06
cal science, social policy, and communication, gender and miThis volume offers an empirically rich, theoretically informed study of the shifting intersections of nation/alism, gender and sexuality. Challenging a scholarly legacy that has overly focused on the masculinist character of nationalism, it
山羊
发表于 2025-3-27 04:52:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8280/827937/827937_32.png
Fecundity
发表于 2025-3-27 06:00:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8280/827937/827937_33.png
DOLT
发表于 2025-3-27 13:11:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8280/827937/827937_34.png
枯燥
发表于 2025-3-27 14:19:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8280/827937/827937_35.png
喃喃而言
发表于 2025-3-27 17:47:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8280/827937/827937_36.png
heart-murmur
发表于 2025-3-28 01:39:22
Amin Kharraz,Engin Kirdadiscourse on Catholicism that predominated in Anglo-Protestant societies, particularly in the United States, from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. Both discourses were based on four similar premises: (a) a theologico-political distinction between “civilized” and “barbaric” religions—
粗糙滥制
发表于 2025-3-28 05:12:51
Anaël Beaugnon,Pierre Chifflier,Francis Bachdiscourse on Catholicism that predominated in Anglo-Protestant societies, particularly in the United States, from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. Both discourses were based on four similar premises: (a) a theologico-political distinction between “civilized” and “barbaric” religions—
inveigh
发表于 2025-3-28 07:18:47
iewed mainly as a history of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) (Iriye 1999: 425). While NGOs became part of the research mainstream in certain areas, mostly among social scientists, historians have been slow to make use of the literature and use it in their writings on the history of the twentiet
健忘症
发表于 2025-3-28 12:25:55
Guangliang Yang,Abner Mendoza,Jialong Zhang,Guofei Gudiscourse on Catholicism that predominated in Anglo-Protestant societies, particularly in the United States, from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century. Both discourses were based on four similar premises: (a) a theologico-political distinction between “civilized” and “barbaric” religions—