nurture 发表于 2025-3-23 13:39:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_11.png

INCH 发表于 2025-3-23 15:22:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_12.png

CORE 发表于 2025-3-23 18:53:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_13.png

北极人 发表于 2025-3-24 00:29:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_14.png

Abrade 发表于 2025-3-24 05:56:43

The Wittgenstein Connection: The Social and the Rationalng Programme (SP) itself (section 6.4) and the causes of belief in theories of truth (section 6.5). In this chapter we will look at what the general CT has to say about the causes of our belief in principles of inference and the conclusions we draw on their basis. Important here is the influence of

亲属 发表于 2025-3-24 09:17:47

An Archaeological Dig Through Foucault’s Textsilosophy. Despite this it will be argued here that one of Foucault’s central doctrines exhibits many of the features, and thus the defects, of the sociology of science discussed in Part II. However his terminology and his emphasis on different factors such as power set him apart as a distinctive the

travail 发表于 2025-3-24 13:30:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_17.png

flaunt 发表于 2025-3-24 17:35:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_18.png

muffler 发表于 2025-3-24 20:20:23

Epilogueaim; anything stronger would require an epidemiological investigation into the occurrence of rational belief, or knowledge. However, in explaining why some scientist came to hold the beliefs they did, we can rightly appeal to principles of logic, epistemology and methodology (the structure of these

Delectable 发表于 2025-3-25 02:17:30

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Rescuing Reason; A Critique of Anti-R Robert Nola Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003 Ludwig Wittgenstein.Marx.Michel