nurture 发表于 2025-3-23 13:39:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_11.pngINCH 发表于 2025-3-23 15:22:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_12.pngCORE 发表于 2025-3-23 18:53:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_13.png北极人 发表于 2025-3-24 00:29:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_14.pngAbrade 发表于 2025-3-24 05:56:43
The Wittgenstein Connection: The Social and the Rationalng Programme (SP) itself (section 6.4) and the causes of belief in theories of truth (section 6.5). In this chapter we will look at what the general CT has to say about the causes of our belief in principles of inference and the conclusions we draw on their basis. Important here is the influence of亲属 发表于 2025-3-24 09:17:47
An Archaeological Dig Through Foucault’s Textsilosophy. Despite this it will be argued here that one of Foucault’s central doctrines exhibits many of the features, and thus the defects, of the sociology of science discussed in Part II. However his terminology and his emphasis on different factors such as power set him apart as a distinctive thetravail 发表于 2025-3-24 13:30:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_17.pngflaunt 发表于 2025-3-24 17:35:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_18.pngmuffler 发表于 2025-3-24 20:20:23
Epilogueaim; anything stronger would require an epidemiological investigation into the occurrence of rational belief, or knowledge. However, in explaining why some scientist came to hold the beliefs they did, we can rightly appeal to principles of logic, epistemology and methodology (the structure of theseDelectable 发表于 2025-3-25 02:17:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8278/827714/827714_20.png