FIS
发表于 2025-3-30 09:45:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826750/826750_51.png
摄取
发表于 2025-3-30 14:18:25
Religious Rules and the Law of the Dutch Statevelopment can be discerned that religiously informed ethics or social traditions no longer run parallel with the generally applicable norms, but are acknowledged through legislative exemptions or even no longer accommodated by the law. Processes of value change both outside and within religious denominations play a role in these developments.
合唱团
发表于 2025-3-30 18:22:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826750/826750_53.png
思想
发表于 2025-3-30 23:26:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826750/826750_54.png
debacle
发表于 2025-3-31 00:54:08
Religious Rules and Principles in Belgian Lawmes the concept is largely open to include any individual feeling of religious duty. Sometimes the concept is only open to registered religions, sometimes it includes any kind of religious or philosophical groups. This report chooses a generous understanding of the concept, while focusing it on traditional religions.
聚集
发表于 2025-3-31 05:57:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826750/826750_56.png
哀求
发表于 2025-3-31 12:04:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826750/826750_57.png
MAOIS
发表于 2025-3-31 13:45:14
State Norms, Religious Norms, and Claims of Plural Normativity under Democratic Constitutionsame of religious or cultural beliefs and practices. In many Western liberal democracies, legal pluralism is high on the agenda of law and religion scholars because State centred legality fails to do justice to the complexity of social and normative interactions. Legal pluralism provides the intellec
ODIUM
发表于 2025-3-31 20:43:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8268/826750/826750_59.png
带伤害
发表于 2025-3-31 23:32:40
Legal Pluralism: Freedom of Religion, Exemptions and the Equality of Citizensjurisdiction. It is often seen therefore to be a challenge to legal centralism or the thesis that the sovereign state has a monopoly over law making to the exclusion of all other sources. It is helpful to make a distinction between ‘weak legal pluralism’ and ‘strong legal pluralism’. The former refe