expository
发表于 2025-3-26 21:07:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8267/826626/826626_31.png
ADORE
发表于 2025-3-27 02:48:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8267/826626/826626_32.png
Crepitus
发表于 2025-3-27 06:22:55
Self-AuthenticationMany mystics argue that their knowledge claims require no testing, since such knowledge is ‘self-authenticating’. Does this idea make sense? This chapter argues that while there could (perhaps) be self-authenticating experiences, they are not the kind of experiences to which mystics lay claim.
MINT
发表于 2025-3-27 12:07:51
Ontological ArgumentsPerhaps the most famous argument in support of belief in the God of classical theism is the ontological argument. This is an . argument, requiring as evidence nothing more than the very idea of God. This chapter outlines both St Anselm’s argument and the more recent ‘modal’ version put forward by Alvin Plantinga.
Gossamer
发表于 2025-3-27 14:34:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8267/826626/826626_35.png
Vsd168
发表于 2025-3-27 17:52:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8267/826626/826626_36.png
ethereal
发表于 2025-3-27 23:16:35
Gregory W. DawesOffers a new method of approaching the philosophy of religion.Presents an interdisciplinary examination of religious knowledge, the aims of religion and commonly cited sources.Encompasses the research
来这真柔软
发表于 2025-3-28 04:10:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8267/826626/826626_38.png
宏伟
发表于 2025-3-28 09:35:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43500-8theology; Christianity; faith; reason; language
裙带关系
发表于 2025-3-28 12:00:54
Book 2016e do religions purport to offer? In what idiom is it couched? From what sources do devotees draw their claims to knowledge? Are these sources reliable? Rather than trying to settle age-old questions about religious belief, the book offers its readers a set of criteria with which they can make informed decisions in matters of faith..