弄脏
发表于 2025-3-28 18:15:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826565/826565_41.png
用树皮
发表于 2025-3-28 21:56:02
Conclusion: The Theological Takeovernges that scholars need to confront. Schmiedel and Smith sketch what such a confrontation could look like in order to point to the instructive and important avenues that the contributions to this compilation have opened up in terms of public scholarship in the current refugee crisis.
说明
发表于 2025-3-29 00:14:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826565/826565_43.png
有机体
发表于 2025-3-29 03:05:14
“Refugees” and the Problem of Identity in the UKlt. Amid all the layers of social, political, and economic context which shape understandings of the “refugee,” Kettle suggests that a robust eschatology of the kingdom of God will need to be articulated if a healthy approach to refugees and identity is to be maintained within churches.
心胸开阔
发表于 2025-3-29 10:13:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826565/826565_45.png
淡紫色花
发表于 2025-3-29 13:20:09
Christ, the Stranger: The Theological Relevance of Migrationnces for the discussion on the position of theology within today’s university, which is challenged ever more frequently despite bold attempts by theologians to increase their relevance. Moreover, it manifests the embarrassment of theologians who are not willing to articulate a specific Christian engagement in Europe’s secular culture.
使乳化
发表于 2025-3-29 18:43:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826565/826565_47.png
groggy
发表于 2025-3-29 22:54:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826565/826565_48.png
Exuberance
发表于 2025-3-30 02:44:28
Fearing the Faith of Others? Government, Religion, and Integration in Norwaystrumentalization of policies of religion in the service of integration, however desirable, are problematized, exposing a tendency in the current Norwegian debate toward a political and academic rehabilitation of the concept of “assimilation.”
倒转
发表于 2025-3-30 05:02:51
Christianity in a Post-Christian Context: Immigration, Church Identity, and the Role of Religion in current refugee crisis. Drawing on Chantal Mouffe’s distinction between antagonism and agonism in the public sphere, Gustafsson Lundberg points out how such debates could be opened to more complex and more complicated positions.