纪念性
发表于 2025-3-21 20:03:17
书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>书目名称CSPR;Religion and Hume‘s Legacy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0826502<br><br> <br><br>
磨碎
发表于 2025-3-21 23:58:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826502/826502_2.png
演绎
发表于 2025-3-22 02:10:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826502/826502_3.png
savage
发表于 2025-3-22 06:30:49
Is Humes’s ‘True Religion’ a Religious Belief? He wanted to combat two philosophical tendencies: one, the tendency of rationalists and the religiously orthodox to go beyond the limits of human knowledge; and two, the tendency of sceptics to restrict these tendencies prematurely.
Irritate
发表于 2025-3-22 08:54:44
Book 1999me can be answered on his own terms. For others, while Hume shows us paths we should not take, these open up the way for a consideration of religious possibilities he never considered. These are not peripheral matters. The responses to them determine the style and spirit in which one pursues philosophy of religion today.
前兆
发表于 2025-3-22 16:56:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826502/826502_6.png
蕨类
发表于 2025-3-22 17:49:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8266/826502/826502_7.png
占线
发表于 2025-3-22 23:35:16
Playing Hume’s Handology. At the beginning of section XII even Philo sounds as though he accepts some version of the argument from design. But those who venerate Hume will rightly doubt whether his nerve failed him at this crucial point. I first argue that there is no need to suppose that it did. For it seems to me th
维持
发表于 2025-3-23 03:06:19
Morality and Religion: Towards Meeting Hume’s Challenget the most austere religious belief as fanatical or superstitious. In this paper I will be calling on Chesterton, Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein (each of whom share Hume’s anti-rationalism) for help in refuting Hume’s equation of ‘true’ with ‘philosophic religion’, and in delineating some less constri
frenzy
发表于 2025-3-23 06:23:07
Voices in Discussionthe universe bears some remote inconceivable analogy to the other operations of nature, and, among the rest, to the economy of human mind and thought’. This bare claim has no implications for practice whatsoever. It does not entail any moral or emotional stance. In other words, it is neither a prefa