babble 发表于 2025-3-25 04:52:18

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_21.png

Jargon 发表于 2025-3-25 09:31:31

n, then they each pick out the same object twice and assert its self-identity. This is a puzzle, because while (1) is clearly true and trivial, (2) an interesting fact of astronomy. They have, in Frege’s terminology, different cognitive value or significance.

焦虑 发表于 2025-3-25 14:12:36

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_23.png

AORTA 发表于 2025-3-25 16:54:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_24.png

hysterectomy 发表于 2025-3-25 21:14:17

http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/826406.jpg

殖民地 发表于 2025-3-26 01:57:50

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_26.png

领带 发表于 2025-3-26 05:45:54

How Systems Break DownWe intend to formulate a principle-based theory through implications of this kind

懒洋洋 发表于 2025-3-26 08:51:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_28.png

BLUSH 发表于 2025-3-26 12:37:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_29.png

Adulate 发表于 2025-3-26 19:05:56

When the Premises Are UntrueIn the previous pages we have reasoned under the assumption that the premises were true, but this is not enough. One cannot accept the “one size fits all” approach.
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Reliability is a New Science; Gnedenko Was Right Paolo Rocchi Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Foundations of the reliab