babble 发表于 2025-3-25 04:52:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_21.pngJargon 发表于 2025-3-25 09:31:31
n, then they each pick out the same object twice and assert its self-identity. This is a puzzle, because while (1) is clearly true and trivial, (2) an interesting fact of astronomy. They have, in Frege’s terminology, different cognitive value or significance.焦虑 发表于 2025-3-25 14:12:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_23.pngAORTA 发表于 2025-3-25 16:54:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_24.pnghysterectomy 发表于 2025-3-25 21:14:17
http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/826406.jpg殖民地 发表于 2025-3-26 01:57:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_26.png领带 发表于 2025-3-26 05:45:54
How Systems Break DownWe intend to formulate a principle-based theory through implications of this kind懒洋洋 发表于 2025-3-26 08:51:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_28.pngBLUSH 发表于 2025-3-26 12:37:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8265/826406/826406_29.pngAdulate 发表于 2025-3-26 19:05:56
When the Premises Are UntrueIn the previous pages we have reasoned under the assumption that the premises were true, but this is not enough. One cannot accept the “one size fits all” approach.