PEL 发表于 2025-3-21 17:13:11

书目名称Relative Income Shares影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Relative Income Shares读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0826182<br><br>        <br><br>

爱得痛了 发表于 2025-3-21 23:32:55

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8262/826182/826182_2.png

UTTER 发表于 2025-3-22 00:38:09

Conclusion,w if any unambiguous predictions. In so far as neo-Keynesian theory can be formulated precisely, it turns out to be wrong. Finally, ignorance about the effects of trade unions on relative shares remains very substantial.

headlong 发表于 2025-3-22 08:36:13

Introduction,t between workers and capitalists. Our categories of employment and property income do not exactly correspond either to neoclassical ‘factor shares’ nor to Marxian ‘class shares’, although they are considerably closer to the latter. This introductory chapter is devoted to a discussion of some important conceptual problems.

空洞 发表于 2025-3-22 12:26:05

Neo-Keynesian Theories,ing the result of expenditure decisions, rather than the other way round — which is perhaps the most important difference between “Keynesian” and “pre-Keynesian” habits of thought. ( p. 94, n. 1).

Charade 发表于 2025-3-22 15:37:40

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8262/826182/826182_6.png

暴行 发表于 2025-3-22 20:21:18

A Survey of the Evidence,r time, rather than on comparing the level of income shares in different countries at any point in time. Apart from such notable exceptions as and , cross-sectional studies are not often found in the literature, and most empirical work has focused on the course of relative shares within ind

scrutiny 发表于 2025-3-22 21:49:00

Marginal Productivity Theory,factor markets, given technology, input supplies and consumer preferences. In its simplest form where there is only one commodity, it reduces to an explanation of functional shares in terms of input supply conditions and technology only.

易于交谈 发表于 2025-3-23 04:34:12

,‘Monopoly’ and Relative Shares, enjoyed by the firm. Kalecki’s pioneering work was largely undertaken in the 1930s, and was deeply influenced by the climate of the times.. Neo-classical economists were confronted by two fundamental and interwoven challenges. The microeconomic paradigm of pure competition was seen to be increasing

NEEDY 发表于 2025-3-23 08:05:18

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8262/826182/826182_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Relative Income Shares; John King,Philip Regan Textbook 1976Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1976 economics.income