消灭
发表于 2025-3-25 06:29:11
Introduction, change agent has to have the right to be sceptical—not to be pessimistic about prospects, but to be sceptical about the value of knowledge. It shows how the ‘gate-keepers’, who define what is to be deemed correct in International Development, can be found in the Development Advisory Committee (DAC)
冷淡周边
发表于 2025-3-25 09:50:40
Development Today: Its Factsng the reader through the images of development easily found through mainstream standard sources. These suggest that it makes sense to use a language that implies that a thing called development exists and that there can be more or less of it. In these terms countries are more or less developed: the
pulse-pressure
发表于 2025-3-25 13:14:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825978/825978_23.png
寄生虫
发表于 2025-3-25 17:16:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825978/825978_24.png
不感兴趣
发表于 2025-3-25 22:44:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825978/825978_25.png
天然热喷泉
发表于 2025-3-26 03:13:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825978/825978_26.png
BROW
发表于 2025-3-26 07:19:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825978/825978_27.png
insular
发表于 2025-3-26 09:34:54
Option 2—Sceptical Development Doctrines—‘We Do Not Need a Tin-Opener’: Ignorance as the Central Prie from the DAC is so great, it is hard to find materials to illustrate development interventions that are, literally, anathema to the social epistemology of the mainstream. As we saw, studies suggest that the main reasons why INGOs use the log-frame is that it is required by their funders—official a
不怕任性
发表于 2025-3-26 15:01:26
The Reinvention of Developmentdency to encourage thinking that development is one dimensional, and coexist with a parallel set of facts of development, equally easy to access, that argues that thinking in this way obscures reality and risks denying voice to poor people or others. Second, that the social epistemologies that give
征服
发表于 2025-3-26 18:24:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8260/825978/825978_30.png