施加
发表于 2025-3-23 10:54:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8259/825816/825816_11.png
BOLUS
发表于 2025-3-23 17:03:32
n and comparison of Frege’s and Russell’s versions of logica.Theories about the ontological structure of the world have generally been described in informal, intuitive terms, and the arguments for and against them, including their consistency and adequacy as explanatory frameworks, have generally be
异端邪说2
发表于 2025-3-23 18:53:56
n and comparison of Frege’s and Russell’s versions of logica.Theories about the ontological structure of the world have generally been described in informal, intuitive terms, and the arguments for and against them, including their consistency and adequacy as explanatory frameworks, have generally be
HUSH
发表于 2025-3-23 23:22:16
hem, including their consistency and adequacy as explanatory frameworks, have generally been given in even more informal terms. The goal of formal ontology is to correct for these deficiencies. By formally reconstructing an intuitive, informal ontological scheme as a formal ontology we can better de
精致
发表于 2025-3-24 03:44:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8259/825816/825816_15.png
Hiatal-Hernia
发表于 2025-3-24 07:17:41
hem, including their consistency and adequacy as explanatory frameworks, have generally been given in even more informal terms. The goal of formal ontology is to correct for these deficiencies. By formally reconstructing an intuitive, informal ontological scheme as a formal ontology we can better de
BOOR
发表于 2025-3-24 13:22:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8259/825816/825816_17.png
CRUE
发表于 2025-3-24 16:05:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8259/825816/825816_18.png
辫子带来帮助
发表于 2025-3-24 20:16:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8259/825816/825816_19.png
CLAIM
发表于 2025-3-25 01:35:44
hem, including their consistency and adequacy as explanatory frameworks, have generally been given in even more informal terms. The goal of formal ontology is to correct for these deficiencies. By formally reconstructing an intuitive, informal ontological scheme as a formal ontology we can better de