溺爱 发表于 2025-3-23 10:13:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824931/824931_11.png厌倦吗你 发表于 2025-3-23 14:34:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824931/824931_12.png孵卵器 发表于 2025-3-23 20:52:37
Book 2016ral rather than marginal to economics and management education, .Reframing Economic Ethics. highlights the need for a paradigm change from mechanistic to humanistic management, and argues that the failures of markets and managers in recent years were paved by a misguided management education. The au爱好 发表于 2025-3-24 01:46:11
Book 2016 to humanistic management, and argues that the failures of markets and managers in recent years were paved by a misguided management education. The author shows how the reader can and must learn from the history of economic thinking in order to overcome the theoretical shortcomings and the practical failings of the present system..步兵 发表于 2025-3-24 02:56:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824931/824931_15.pngExclude 发表于 2025-3-24 08:54:35
The Teleological Paradigm,losophy of Aristotle), . (in pursuit of ., as in the ethics of Thomas Aquinas), and in regard to the question as to how ethical business strategies can be successfully developed (based on ., as in the economics of Adam Smith).疏远天际 发表于 2025-3-24 13:23:46
2662-124X y manner to the on-going discussion on how to reform managem.This book reconstructs major paradigms in the history of economic ethics up to, and including, the present day. Asserting that ethics should be integral rather than marginal to economics and management education, .Reframing Economic Ethics轻打 发表于 2025-3-24 15:56:32
Introduction,und Kapeller 2010). Former fixtures of the conventional wisdom of the economics discipline—such as the macroeconomic quest for ever more growth and the microeconomic pursuit of profit—are now held responsible for many social, ecological, and moral failings of the present economic system (Pirson andCollar 发表于 2025-3-24 20:11:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824931/824931_19.pngacquisition 发表于 2025-3-25 00:36:18
The Teleological Paradigm,ethics was reached with the “teleological paradigm” that also dominated much of classical economics. From Aristotle via Thomas Aquinas, up to and including Adam Smith, there was a consensus that both economic theory and practice needed to be . as well as . by a certain overarching goal (Greek: .) su