Filibuster
发表于 2025-3-25 03:42:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824928/824928_21.png
theta-waves
发表于 2025-3-25 09:25:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824928/824928_22.png
disparage
发表于 2025-3-25 13:25:30
Meta-Critiquing: Critique, Hermeneutics, Theoryique; but rather to indicate the issues at stake in grasping how it has been understood in the work of Immanuel Kant and in post-Kantian thinkers such as Michel Foucault, Theodor Adorno, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Paul Ricoeur, and Gianni Vattimo. The chapter argues for the necessary reciprocity of critiqu
inundate
发表于 2025-3-25 19:34:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824928/824928_24.png
使厌恶
发表于 2025-3-25 23:55:53
The Scope of Literary Theoryd its targets in literary study are often understood too narrowly. This chapter isolates three broad functions for theorization: (1) description and explanation, both general (e.g., in accounts of genre) and particular (e.g., in methods for interpreting individual works); (2) ethical-political or es
Parley
发表于 2025-3-26 02:55:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824928/824928_26.png
注意到
发表于 2025-3-26 05:36:17
Unstable Literatureare moving in every direction and thwart attempts to develop normative elements which are often nothing more than a disguised scale of values, Doubinsky advocates a relative position of the critical reader, as well as a redefinition of “works” based on their object nature. He thus intends to go beyo
Host142
发表于 2025-3-26 09:48:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824928/824928_28.png
变量
发表于 2025-3-26 14:01:10
The Function of Criticism in a “Post-secular” Ageeopen the question of how we talk (or remain silent) about the religious elements of literary texts (belief, doctrine, the distinction between religion and myth) from the Enlightenment on, with a focus on the tools (or lack thereof) at our disposal. Challenging the supposed religious-to-secular narr
Deject
发表于 2025-3-26 19:03:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8250/824928/824928_30.png