Palter
发表于 2025-3-23 10:22:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_11.png
Judicious
发表于 2025-3-23 17:28:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_12.png
cultivated
发表于 2025-3-23 18:53:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_13.png
清晰
发表于 2025-3-23 22:11:34
Recipient States in an Asymmetric System,tologically refuse to take those states as normal states in International Relations. ‘Normality’ is hereby defined by the idea of a state that, regardless of world region, is capable of defining political goals and underlying strategies of pursuit of such goals. In other words, recipient states in s
DOSE
发表于 2025-3-24 05:09:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_15.png
爱哭
发表于 2025-3-24 08:52:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_16.png
harpsichord
发表于 2025-3-24 14:20:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_17.png
acolyte
发表于 2025-3-24 16:39:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_18.png
Concrete
发表于 2025-3-24 21:47:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_19.png
fibula
发表于 2025-3-25 01:37:57
Conclusion: Recipient States Being Sovereign,and social forces has invited a reassessment of the structural realist contribution to International Politics. The basic concern for the role of states as essential units of the system is increasingly important not just for the study of global health governance as such, but also the understanding of