Palter 发表于 2025-3-23 10:22:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_11.pngJudicious 发表于 2025-3-23 17:28:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_12.pngcultivated 发表于 2025-3-23 18:53:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_13.png清晰 发表于 2025-3-23 22:11:34
Recipient States in an Asymmetric System,tologically refuse to take those states as normal states in International Relations. ‘Normality’ is hereby defined by the idea of a state that, regardless of world region, is capable of defining political goals and underlying strategies of pursuit of such goals. In other words, recipient states in sDOSE 发表于 2025-3-24 05:09:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_15.png爱哭 发表于 2025-3-24 08:52:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_16.pngharpsichord 发表于 2025-3-24 14:20:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_17.pngacolyte 发表于 2025-3-24 16:39:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_18.pngConcrete 发表于 2025-3-24 21:47:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8241/824019/824019_19.pngfibula 发表于 2025-3-25 01:37:57
Conclusion: Recipient States Being Sovereign,and social forces has invited a reassessment of the structural realist contribution to International Politics. The basic concern for the role of states as essential units of the system is increasingly important not just for the study of global health governance as such, but also the understanding of