Ceramic
发表于 2025-3-23 12:41:54
tific rationality. However, rational arguments in legislative phase often remain limited because legislation typically follows political rationality aiming at political goals. Moreover, the effects of law, for example the effects of information society legislation, very often are unforeseeable. Ther
Dorsal
发表于 2025-3-23 15:08:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8237/823654/823654_12.png
Homocystinuria
发表于 2025-3-23 19:51:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8237/823654/823654_13.png
dissolution
发表于 2025-3-23 23:08:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8237/823654/823654_14.png
tooth-decay
发表于 2025-3-24 05:42:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8237/823654/823654_15.png
急性
发表于 2025-3-24 09:27:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8237/823654/823654_16.png
遭受
发表于 2025-3-24 13:58:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8237/823654/823654_17.png
全神贯注于
发表于 2025-3-24 15:21:40
n seriously, this ideal expectation urges the question of whether MPs can actually justify their enactments by arguing, i.e. by giving and exchanging reasons for and against legislation, and how we could possibly ascertain the quality of their argumentation. This chapter suggests a structural accoun
PLAYS
发表于 2025-3-24 20:37:57
democratize lawmaking. This tendency operates in conjunction with a number of conflicting factors of a national and supranational character. As a result, the process of introducing new lawmaking technologies is uneven. In reality, completely opposite variants of the organization of societal impact a
backdrop
发表于 2025-3-24 23:58:27
, acceptability and effectivity. In order to study legislation and the foreseeability of effects of law, cognitive conceptual tools are necessary. Following this idea, here legislation has been studied as process and phases: pre-legislative, legislative and post-legislative. In addition to that, the