生命 发表于 2025-3-23 10:48:31

Equality of What?,n, whereas we might have equality in terms of all kinds of things – equality before the law, basic moral equality, for instance – typically egalitarians are concerned with a substantive understanding of equality that relates broadly to how well people’s lives go, not just the formal equal freedoms t

持久 发表于 2025-3-23 17:05:15

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822515/822515_12.png

CORD 发表于 2025-3-23 20:01:54

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822515/822515_13.png

Ischemia 发表于 2025-3-24 00:29:43

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822515/822515_14.png

auxiliary 发表于 2025-3-24 05:07:58

The Value of Equality,ic of equality is best or whether disadvantage caused by personal irresponsibility is a permissible reason to allow inequalities. However, if equality is the central value for egalitarians, then . it is of value should be an obvious starting point for any discussion of egalitarianism – and that is the subject of this chapter.

overhaul 发表于 2025-3-24 09:09:45

Conclusion: Assessing the Prospects for Egalitarianism,er egalitarianism has identified the most important sources of inequality and whether the positions that have been advanced are substantial enough to achieve significant types of equality between people.

得体 发表于 2025-3-24 14:31:22

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822515/822515_17.png

半导体 发表于 2025-3-24 15:41:51

Michael Stauffer,Paul Maergner,Andreas Fischer,Kaspar Riesenparental groups, populations were self limiting at a mean of 16 animals per population. Birth of litters was limited largely to the single founding female. Reproduction ceased in 15 groups when populations grew and litter survival dropped to zero, and in the remaining groups when the founding mother

Mobile 发表于 2025-3-24 21:12:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822515/822515_19.png

inconceivable 发表于 2025-3-25 02:29:44

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822515/822515_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Reassessing Egalitarianism; Jeremy Moss Book 2014 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2014 Egalitarianism.Equality.Responsibil