陶醉 发表于 2025-3-23 11:39:43

Parfit-Inspired Candidates for Meta-Level Criteria, a wide variety of possible meta-level criteria. Doing this will make it possible to classify the criteria and discern their logical relationships. It may turn out that many of the criteria are compatible, and that some of them subsume others. It may turn out that some of the criteria are incompatib

glucagon 发表于 2025-3-23 15:58:23

Brandt-Inspired Candidates for Meta-Level Criteria, Theories. Our method is also similar: we shall examine various arguments that support and oppose Brandt’s Reasons Theory with the aim of identifying and articulating the underlying meta-level criteria. In many cases the criteria that we unearth will prove to be the same or similar to those that we

Robust 发表于 2025-3-23 18:35:47

Selecting and Using Meta-Level Criteria,ng criteria has been to canvass a variety of criteria used in arguments for and against Parfit’s and Brandt’s Reasons Theories. This allowed us to identify and classify a variety of criterion candidates. Of course we have no assurance that all the important candidates have been included, so our conc

Interdict 发表于 2025-3-23 23:30:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822510/822510_14.png

胶状 发表于 2025-3-24 02:25:21

Are We Limited to a Particular Tradition?,defend the Inclusive Data View against objections that seek to tie it to a particular tradition. In the third section, I shall argue against the view that the selection of a Reasons Theory should depend on the tradition of the selector.

stress-response 发表于 2025-3-24 09:56:46

Introduction: Basic Concepts, Method, and Summary of Chapters,reer to pursue. Some deliberations aim at decisions that are meant to affect only ourselves; some aim at decisions meant to affect others. Deliberations may be solitary, or they may involve dialogue with others. All deliberations, however, involve thinking about reasons for action.

推崇 发表于 2025-3-24 12:55:48

The Inclusive Data View,ught to be guided by, is their usefulness in making sense of a variety of data.—rather than, say, their success in articulating the considerations that figure in our actual shared practices of deliberation, or their usefulness in explicating the agreed-on considered judgments of people who take the objective standpoint.

职业 发表于 2025-3-24 16:07:01

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822510/822510_18.png

高歌 发表于 2025-3-24 19:08:59

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822510/822510_19.png

CORD 发表于 2025-3-24 23:14:13

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822510/822510_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Reasons for Action; Toward a Normative T B. C. Postow Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1999 bibliography.reason.tradition