duodenum
发表于 2025-3-21 18:57:37
书目名称Reasoning with Rules影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Reasoning with Rules读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0822504<br><br> <br><br>
degradation
发表于 2025-3-21 21:36:05
Jaap C. Hageh mehrere in Frage kommende Theorien oder Theorieansätze zu berücksichtigen, die unterschiedliche potenzielle Einflussfaktoren thematisieren. In diesem Sinne besagt die Leitidee des theoretischen Pluralismus, dass im Interesse des Erkenntnisfortschritts nach konkurrierenden theoretischen Ansätzen ge
异常
发表于 2025-3-22 02:41:37
Jaap C. Hageh mehrere in Frage kommende Theorien oder Theorieansätze zu berücksichtigen, die unterschiedliche potenzielle Einflussfaktoren thematisieren. In diesem Sinne besagt die Leitidee des theoretischen Pluralismus, dass im Interesse des Erkenntnisfortschritts nach konkurrierenden theoretischen Ansätzen ge
杂役
发表于 2025-3-22 06:34:35
Introduction,ontent of the rule and the classification of the facts (cf. Aarnio 1987, p. 120). Given these decisions on the content of the rule and the classification of the facts, the legal consequences of the case follow ‘logically’.
certitude
发表于 2025-3-22 09:21:43
1572-4395 rules are not statements which describe the world, butrather means by which humans impose structure on the world. Legalrules create legal consequences, they do not describe them. This hasconsequences for the logic of rule- and principle-applying arguments,the most important of which may be that such
贝雷帽
发表于 2025-3-22 12:56:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822504/822504_6.png
乏味
发表于 2025-3-22 17:52:20
Book 1997etween rules, principles, and reasons. Moreover, it describes alogical theory which assigns a central place to the notion of reasonsfor and against a conclusion, and which is especially suited to dealwith rules and principles.
Nebulous
发表于 2025-3-22 23:37:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822504/822504_8.png
省略
发表于 2025-3-23 03:45:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8226/822504/822504_9.png
悬挂
发表于 2025-3-23 05:59:29
Reasoning with Rules,pter I, I tried to make it plausible that this semantic notion of validity is not very suitable if we are dealing with rules. The elaborate discussion in chapter II of reasons and their relation to principles, goals and rules, should have substantiated this claim.