enflame 发表于 2025-3-23 11:00:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822489/822489_11.png

狼群 发表于 2025-3-23 17:50:43

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822489/822489_12.png

Colonnade 发表于 2025-3-23 18:02:27

Book 2011 between many fields, from philosophy and computer science to economics, linguistics, and psychology. For the experienced scholar access to a large body of recent literature is provided and the novice gets a thorough introduction to the action and techniques of dynamic logic.

不整齐 发表于 2025-3-24 00:06:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822489/822489_14.png

jet-lag 发表于 2025-3-24 06:20:14

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822489/822489_15.png

otic-capsule 发表于 2025-3-24 09:39:00

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822489/822489_16.png

捕鲸鱼叉 发表于 2025-3-24 13:17:03

Preference over Worlds: Static Logicdering, indicating that one alternative is “better” than another. For instance, when playing chess or other games, choosing a move π. instead of π. is determined largely by a consideration concerning the outcomes that π. or π. leads to. In general, individual preferences can be used to predict behav

Introduction 发表于 2025-3-24 17:21:35

Preference over Worlds: Dynamic Logicis the . of preference change. Our preferences are modified constantly through commands of moral authorities, suggestions from friends who give good advice, or just changes in our own evaluation of worlds and actions. Living in a society, our preference is also affected by what others like or dislik

spondylosis 发表于 2025-3-24 23:05:32

Entanglement of Preference, Knowledge and Beliefke her preferences into account, but also what she knows or believes about the outcomes of her actions. And in rational social decisions, she will also factor in what she knows about the preferences of others.. Knowledge, belief and preference are often deeply entangled in our reasoning.

acheon 发表于 2025-3-25 00:32:31

http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822489/822489_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Reasoning about Preference Dynamics; Fenrong Liu Book 2011 Springer Netherlands 2011 belief.deontic logic.deontic reasoning.dynamic episte