Efflorescent
发表于 2025-3-28 15:44:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822448/822448_41.png
生命层
发表于 2025-3-28 21:29:28
,Reflections on Israel Scheffler’s Philosophy of Religion, metaphysical garb, so that what remains are simply the matters of living to which religion ought properly on his view address itself. The Bible is thus reconceptualized as a piece of rich literature, of no real difference in logical kind to any other piece of rich literature, except that it defines
Mets552
发表于 2025-3-28 23:48:37
Book 1997s on Scheffler‘s philosophy of education byscholars from around the world. The papers address the wide range oftopics that Scheffler‘s work in philosophy of education has addressed,including the aims of education, cognition and emotion, teaching, thelanguage of education, science education, moral ed
achlorhydria
发表于 2025-3-29 07:09:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822448/822448_44.png
triptans
发表于 2025-3-29 07:48:49
Rational Passions and Intellectual Virtues. A Conceptual Analysis,onceptions of intellectual virtues are avoided by making the required distinctions. For example, it is argued that our concept of an intellectual virtue should not be confused with a normative conception of intellectual virtuousness.
conduct
发表于 2025-3-29 13:34:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822448/822448_46.png
ANN
发表于 2025-3-29 17:18:49
ited papers on Scheffler‘s philosophy of education byscholars from around the world. The papers address the wide range oftopics that Scheffler‘s work in philosophy of education has addressed,including the aims of education, cognition and emotion, teaching, thelanguage of education, science education
铁塔等
发表于 2025-3-29 22:23:13
,Editor’s Introduction, Harvard faculty in 1952, and retired from it in 1992. He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Brooklyn College, and his Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Pennsylvania under the direction of Nelson Goodman.
玛瑙
发表于 2025-3-30 00:51:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8225/822448/822448_49.png
小丑
发表于 2025-3-30 07:04:17
Critical Thinking and Foundational Development, mean the evolution of principles which are constitutive of our conceptualization of a certain domain of rationality. How can claims that some such principles are better than prior ones, be justified? We argue that Scheffler’s meta-criterion of overall systematic credibility is insufficient here. Tw