Fibrin
发表于 2025-3-26 21:21:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822365/822365_31.png
Motilin
发表于 2025-3-27 02:07:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822365/822365_32.png
grandiose
发表于 2025-3-27 05:24:34
,“Languaged” World, “Worlded” Language: On Margolis’s Pragmatic Integration of Realism and Idealism,aged” while our language is “worlded” (e.g., Margolis 1994b, 523; cf. also Margolis 1993b, 323). What this means, in a first approximation, is that reality and the language(s) we use to categorize it are inseparably entangled, and there is no epistemically accessible language- or categorization-inde
cluster
发表于 2025-3-27 13:12:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822365/822365_34.png
arboretum
发表于 2025-3-27 16:17:44
Toward a Pragmatically Naturalist Metaphysics of the Fact-Value Entanglement: Emergence or Continuisibly suggests that the rejection of this age-old dichotomy has been a key pragmatist theme since the work of William James and John Dewey. While I find Putnam’s elaborations on the fact-value entanglement – and his attribution of that entanglement to the classical pragmatists – highly interesting a
儿童
发表于 2025-3-27 18:12:23
Finnish Versions of Pragmatist Humanism: Eino Kaila and Georg Henrik von Wright as Quasi-Pragmatistatist tradition but also philosophical ideas not explicitly influenced by the American pragmatists yet bearing striking resemblance to pragmatist thought. Philosophers in the Nordic countries were no exception. Pragmatist themes were discussed early on especially in Denmark, Sweden, and Finland. (Fo
COW
发表于 2025-3-28 00:01:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822365/822365_37.png
追逐
发表于 2025-3-28 04:03:31
1571-3083 n favor of a transcendental pragmatism.Shows how transcenden.The essays collected in this volume and authored by Sami Pihlström emphasize that our relation to the world we live in and seek to represent and get to know better through our practices of conceptualization and inquiry is irreducibly valua
开玩笑
发表于 2025-3-28 08:50:14
A New Look at Wittgenstein and Pragmatism,nsofar as we are concerned with Wittgenstein’s relation to the classical pragmatist William James (or even to Charles S. Peirce and John Dewey). Any examination of Wittgenstein’s relation to pragmatism must begin with Goodman’s careful historical work, to which it is very difficult to add significantly new scholarly results.
灯丝
发表于 2025-3-28 13:35:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822365/822365_40.png