散步 发表于 2025-3-26 21:40:53
Manfred Borovcnik,Ramesh Kapadiaientific work of Frantz Fanon and Amílcar Cabral, demonstrating how their philosophical commitments can help lead one out of the practical and theoretical issues faced by the current, predominant orientation, and concludes by forging links between their work and that of some contemporary feministepistemologists. .978-3-030-49964-8978-3-030-49962-4EXULT 发表于 2025-3-27 03:24:40
Astrid Brinkmann,Klaus Brinkmannmself uses an instrumental argumentation arguing in favor of deliberative democracy (i.e. when he claims that a state with more well-being is better than a state with less well-being). The chapter ends with a claim that the truth tenet should be endorsed.bleach 发表于 2025-3-27 08:23:20
Tim Brophy. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end thTIA742 发表于 2025-3-27 11:21:58
Jean Charpingeneral argument to the effect that entitlement should not be viewed as an epistemic status that is grounded in an internalist condition. The argument rests on the idea that epistemic rights — like other rights — provide presumptive criteria for how one ought to be treated by others, based on factor把手 发表于 2025-3-27 17:30:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822312/822312_35.png叫喊 发表于 2025-3-27 21:10:18
Günter Graumanned to see how – through inscriptional activity – they can both extend their own learning and knowing and improve the systems in which they are working..These ideas are particularly useful to professional educators who are aiming for a better alignment between educational goals and inscriptional taskNOT 发表于 2025-3-28 00:32:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822312/822312_37.pngDOTE 发表于 2025-3-28 04:03:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8224/822312/822312_38.png连累 发表于 2025-3-28 09:54:14
Patrick Johnson,John O’Donoghueemic governance as a new paradigm for research into global social change.. This book will be of use to students in upper level degree programs who want to design empirical research into social change as well as researchers in sociology, political science and public policy..Resistance 发表于 2025-3-28 11:51:56
Astrid Kubicekistemic governance wherever necessary and appropriate. Epistemic governance as such we discuss and present in Sect. 3.2.2. InConclusion, we then focus on possible implications of epistemic governance for the academic profession (academic faculty) and their academic careers.