labyrinth
发表于 2025-3-25 04:42:20
Systemic Racism: Reading Ralph Ellison with Bourdieu’s Theory of Powerrogressive Black author has remained a fundamental controversy in the field of literary criticism. Rather than focusing on Ellison’s political views, this chapter attempts to contribute to the debate by reading his major work, the novel . (1952), as a radical expression of systemic anti-Black racism
AVANT
发表于 2025-3-25 10:13:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822049/822049_22.png
Pelago
发表于 2025-3-25 14:44:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822049/822049_23.png
OGLE
发表于 2025-3-25 17:44:38
Literariness and the Double Bind of Stigmare still deeply embedded in public consciousness and frequently find their expression in acts of discrimination. This chapter considers the role that literary texts, especially life writing by individuals with ‘mental illnesses,’ can play in efforts to undermine stereotypes about ‘the mad.’ The comp
乏味
发表于 2025-3-25 20:38:25
Civilization and Its Discontents: Reading Chuck Palahniuk’s , with Norbert Eliasand Chuck Palahniuk’s . as forms of resistance against the systemic control of modern capitalism. I have chosen to read . through the lens of Norbert Elias’s sociology because it is more deeply responsive to the way the novel ‘enacts’ the emotional dynamics of ‘putting the body at risk’. Elias’s soc
学术讨论会
发表于 2025-3-26 02:32:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822049/822049_26.png
flammable
发表于 2025-3-26 08:13:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822049/822049_27.png
Schlemms-Canal
发表于 2025-3-26 08:27:12
re and sociology.Highlights the mechanisms of the social as .Reading the Social in American Studies .offers a unique exploration of the advantages and benefits in using sociological terms and concepts in American literary and cultural studies and, conversely, in using literature—understood broadly—t
Bumptious
发表于 2025-3-26 12:52:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8221/822049/822049_29.png
Infirm
发表于 2025-3-26 20:51:03
Book 2022an literary and cultural studies and, conversely, in using literature—understood broadly—to uncover a microlevel of the social. Its temporal scope ranges from the early 19th to the 21st century, providing a historical dimension that is otherwise often missing from studies on the conjunction of liter