后退
发表于 2025-3-23 12:50:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8220/821999/821999_11.png
巡回
发表于 2025-3-23 17:50:32
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137084644Skin; material culture; medieval literature; culture; English; English literature; imagination; literature;
vector
发表于 2025-3-23 18:48:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8220/821999/821999_13.png
Outshine
发表于 2025-3-23 23:13:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8220/821999/821999_14.png
concert
发表于 2025-3-24 03:56:06
,Wondrous Skins and Tactile Affection: The Blemmye’s Touch,of others touches us. We can touch the things we read, and, as medievalists, some of the things we read really are skin. We are even talking more and more about the fact that parchment is skin.. Yet we’re not talking much about what this reading . like, even though touching manuscripts can yield val
alliance
发表于 2025-3-24 07:38:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8220/821999/821999_16.png
phytochemicals
发表于 2025-3-24 13:22:28
,Havelok’s Bare Life and the Significance of Skin, skin provide a support for symbolic activity, say in the context of medieval viewing or reading practices or by virtue of its deployment as a judicial penalty? When, conversely, does it operate only as an abject, material residue? As Sarah Kay has demonstrated in a series of recent articles, mediev
使尴尬
发表于 2025-3-24 15:18:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8220/821999/821999_18.png
删减
发表于 2025-3-24 21:13:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8220/821999/821999_19.png
Nefarious
发表于 2025-3-25 00:20:54
The Form of the Formless: Medieval Taxonomies of Skin, Flesh, and the Human,; it is that which inscribes the interior on the exterior and manifests the self. Didier Anzieu’s influential psychoanalytical theory, for example, understands skin to function as the background or screen against which the self emerges: skin is thus “a basic datum that is of both an organic and an i