睨视
发表于 2025-3-23 10:38:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821520/821520_11.png
吼叫
发表于 2025-3-23 14:58:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821520/821520_12.png
面包屑
发表于 2025-3-23 19:08:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821520/821520_13.png
extinguish
发表于 2025-3-24 01:48:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821520/821520_14.png
结束
发表于 2025-3-24 02:30:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821520/821520_15.png
Focus-Words
发表于 2025-3-24 10:35:21
Conclusion, pragmatic nor practical, and, although theorizing has been criticized for its impracticality, we must see that it is actually far more practical than any legal positivism or ethical relativism. Maybe, however, the positivists were right about one thing: theorizing, alone, does not achieve results.
责怪
发表于 2025-3-24 12:58:31
1387-6678 ch a framework: Logical Judgment, Conceptual Synthesis, Conceptual Abstraction, and Freedom. As part of the ‘grammar of goodness,‘ the excellence of these phenomena, in a highly concrete way, constitute the essence of the greatest good, as this book explains.978-3-319-34654-0978-3-319-02285-7Series ISSN 1387-6678 Series E-ISSN 2215-0323
有恶意
发表于 2025-3-24 16:51:10
Stephen PetroAnalyzes the woefully overlooked philosophical interchange between Gewirth and Habermas on the vital issue of the dialectical method in ethics and value theory.Provides a strong and controversial crit
引起痛苦
发表于 2025-3-24 19:23:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821520/821520_19.png
样式
发表于 2025-3-25 00:12:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821520/821520_20.png