Asperity
发表于 2025-3-28 16:48:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821513/821513_41.png
Essential
发表于 2025-3-28 19:10:41
From Pascal to Ellsberg: Paradoxes of Rationality Stimulate the Progress of Decision Theoryesilience of the “anomaly”. Observed decisions contradict the “sure-thing principle” which is a core axiom of rational decision making. The hypothesis of a distinction between more or less rational actors was refuted. Even subjects who chose “rational” options in social dilemma games behave “irrational” when faced with the Ellsberg paradox.
场所
发表于 2025-3-29 01:27:43
Sociology in Times of Pandemic: Metatheoretical Considerations and the Example of the Covid-19 Crisid consequences of social interventions associated with the Covid-19 crisis. We state that this sort of sociology now is disputed neither within the scientific community nor outside in the media and the general society, although this had been the case constantly before the pandemic.
nerve-sparing
发表于 2025-3-29 03:08:32
978-3-658-33535-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wies
容易懂得
发表于 2025-3-29 09:52:25
http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/821513.jpg
脆弱带来
发表于 2025-3-29 15:01:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821513/821513_46.png
含糊其辞
发表于 2025-3-29 17:14:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821513/821513_47.png
LITHE
发表于 2025-3-29 22:13:40
Rationality in Social Science: Introduction,ons on which theories of rational choice build as well as criticism of and alternatives for such assumptions. These chapters likewise discuss how theories of rational choice can be applied in social science explanations and highlight problems of explanations relying on rational choice assumptions.
Morphine
发表于 2025-3-30 00:17:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821513/821513_49.png
TOXIN
发表于 2025-3-30 07:48:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8216/821513/821513_50.png