否认
发表于 2025-3-23 10:25:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8205/820417/820417_11.png
孵卵器
发表于 2025-3-23 15:20:15
978-1-4039-6436-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2001
sperse
发表于 2025-3-23 18:15:10
Visible and Invisible Books in N-Dimensional Spacell the news organs have picked up the story:
似少年
发表于 2025-3-24 00:06:12
Dialogue and Interpretation at the Interface of Man and Machinetrying to think about texts, documents, and their possible electronic transformations, I am going to begin at a severely oblique angle. I do this to set a visibly disorienting figure—obliquity—into the rhetorical structure of the exposition. We all know too much about texts and textuality. We need to think about them in different ways.
iodides
发表于 2025-3-24 03:26:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8205/820417/820417_15.png
繁殖
发表于 2025-3-24 09:23:14
http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/820417.jpg
Aqueous-Humor
发表于 2025-3-24 12:03:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10738-1Interpretation; literary studies; space; literature; space
法律的瑕疵
发表于 2025-3-24 17:11:16
The Rationale of Hypertextunction. Some distribute general knowledge to society at large, some send it to particular groups whose professional history makes information about information an important and perhaps problematic issue.
fatty-acids
发表于 2025-3-24 20:01:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8205/820417/820417_19.png
异端邪说下
发表于 2025-3-24 23:56:16
Rethinking Textualitye) ways. By “ordered ambivalence” we mean the signifying differentials set in play when a rhetoric of intention is applied to a document. Textual differentials at any level are a function of the effort to control or even eliminate them.