palliate
发表于 2025-3-28 17:56:08
Basic Theory of the 1922 Mathematical Statistics Paper,ppeared in 1922 in the 59-page article “On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics” . The paper opens with general remarks about the then-current state, of theoretical statistics.
友好
发表于 2025-3-28 19:19:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820042/820042_42.png
Kinetic
发表于 2025-3-29 01:09:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820042/820042_43.png
轻率的你
发表于 2025-3-29 06:57:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820042/820042_44.png
沟通
发表于 2025-3-29 10:54:19
The Behrens-Fisher and Fieller-Creasy Problems,nity satisfied with the mathematically simpler confidence approach, and rejected as logically imperfect and inconsistent in general by those who recognized the strength of the fiducial objectives, the fiducial argument continues under active and sympathetic study today only in a few islands of the statistical world.
Accord
发表于 2025-3-29 15:22:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820042/820042_46.png
orthopedist
发表于 2025-3-29 17:04:22
0930-0325 ograph will be a useful source of reference to most of Fisher‘s major papers; it will certainly provide background material for much vigorous discussion." #.Australian Journal of Statistics.#1978-0-387-90476-4978-1-4612-6079-0Series ISSN 0930-0325 Series E-ISSN 2197-7186
骗子
发表于 2025-3-29 21:08:34
Fisher and the Analysis of Variance, — his analysis is wrong — nor the role of randomization. Secondly, although the analysis of variance is closely tied to additive models, Fisher rejects the additive model in his first analysis of variance, proceeding to a multiplicative model as more reasonable.
Hypomania
发表于 2025-3-30 03:21:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820042/820042_49.png
Myelin
发表于 2025-3-30 04:25:41
R.A. Fisher: Some Introductory Remarks,ohesive well-founded discipline. Along the way his strongly-held scientific views and somewhat difficult personality led to disputes, in some of which he was undoubtedly wrong. In almost no avenue of statistical science did he pursue ideas so exhaustively as to leave clear, unambiguous material. His