judicial 发表于 2025-3-23 11:05:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820039/820039_11.pngoverrule 发表于 2025-3-23 14:59:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820039/820039_12.pngADJ 发表于 2025-3-23 18:09:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820039/820039_13.pngVertebra 发表于 2025-3-23 22:36:46
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1990争议的苹果 发表于 2025-3-24 03:05:10
Overview: This is a study of Hawtrey‘s role in the development of economics. It presents a statement of his theories and an account of his dealings with two of his most prominent contemporaries: John Maynard Keynes and Dennis Robertson.978-1-349-10700-1precede 发表于 2025-3-24 07:11:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8201/820039/820039_16.png感情脆弱 发表于 2025-3-24 10:40:09
Book 1990This is a study of Hawtrey‘s role in the development of economics. It presents a statement of his theories and an account of his dealings with two of his most prominent contemporaries: John Maynard Keynes and Dennis Robertson.帽子 发表于 2025-3-24 15:53:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10700-1Keynes; macroeconomics; money不可接触 发表于 2025-3-24 21:50:09
Hawtrey and Robertson,n greater degree than Hawtrey, he was a friend of Keynes and at various times either his collaborator or critic. Perhaps it is not surprising that Robertson and Hawtrey crossed paths — and swords — repeatedly.TATE 发表于 2025-3-25 01:52:33
,Reactions to Hawtrey’s Economics in the Interwar Period Literature,individual’s contribution resides in the response to it from his fellow scientists and in the impact it has on their work. If a body of work fails to affect the ideas and research of others, it is a dead-end; whatever its intrinsic merit, it has no further consequence for the progress of knowledge.