PANG 发表于 2025-3-23 12:38:40
Philosophical Arguments for Post-Gender Ontological Ethics,nt for a more enabling mode of being. Beauvoir’s ontological ethics can be used as a foundation for arguing that freedom is the purposive enactment of existence, that sexual difference prevents this, and given that our subjectivity is fundamentally situated, that purposive existence can only be enac雪白 发表于 2025-3-23 15:28:28
Lucy Nicholasativity theory, there is a metaphysics which grounds and explains this epistemology. The writer learned of the existence of this unique Einsteinian epistemlogy for the first time from the words and work of Einstein and part of the problem has been to abstract the Einsteinian methodology from the act利用 发表于 2025-3-23 20:54:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7818/781706/781706_13.pngaggressor 发表于 2025-3-24 00:00:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7818/781706/781706_14.png我要沮丧 发表于 2025-3-24 03:15:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7818/781706/781706_15.png愤慨点吧 发表于 2025-3-24 09:21:14
Diagnosing and Transcending Sexual Difference,offer an account of the ontology of gender that explains this persistence even in the face of significant attempts to challenge it. This ‘explanatory-diagnostic analysis’ (Benhabib 1985: 405), that is, the attempt to determine what causes this persistence, has significant political and practical imp内行 发表于 2025-3-24 14:17:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7818/781706/781706_17.png手铐 发表于 2025-3-24 16:43:22
Philosophical Arguments for Post-Gender Ontological Ethics,tions for the problems of sex/gender are insufficient for analysing the realities of sex/gender and for overcoming its effects. This chapter seeks a more effective ‘ontological ethical’ (Stanley 1996) theory to constitute the key philosophical argument and justification for post-gender ethics. It usSupplement 发表于 2025-3-24 21:14:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7818/781706/781706_19.png使声音降低 发表于 2025-3-25 01:13:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7818/781706/781706_20.png